Politicians. Are they capable of saying anything truthful?
London and a lone murdering scumbag of a Muslim kills five.
Theresa May spews out this:-
“Mr Speaker, it is still believed that this attacker acted alone, and the police have no reason to believe there are imminent further attacks on the public. His identity is known to the police and MI5 and, when operational considerations allow, he will be publicly identified. What I can confirm is that the man was British-born and that – some years ago – he was once investigated in relation to concerns about violent extremism. He was a peripheral figure.”
In computers us old school engineers would have blamed nonsense coming out of a machine as a programing or operating error, GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT aka GIGO.
Yet unlike 101% of all Microsoft Products, politicians can GIGO the most incredulous nonsense instantly, put spin on the most blatant of events, avoid apportioning blame when that’s exactly what is needed, and just plain LIE in order to meet their personal agenda.
So I’ve got a question.
If this swine was acting alone, why have 10 been arrested including a Saudi National?
But in another development, imagine my thoughts about this:-
Muslims at mosques linked to Khalid Masood fear anti-Islam backlash.
Worshippers in Leyton, east London, and Birmingham condemn Westminster attack amid worries that they will be demonised. (Guardian)
Like I give a flying fk’ about their sensitive feelings. Like anyone does.
I wonder, if some driver was to lose control of a vehicle and splatter a few of them, would that be an instant hate crime?
Would that bring out the ‘Hug a terrorist as they know not what they do” bleeding hearts?
It would be if the government take a hike.
A rage is building BUT you can also see it being diffused and nulled out in both the media and government. Anything to keep the B.S. policies of appeasement going, the lie of multiculturalism, the wrong of forcing muti-faith tolerance on us the English Christians.
Only there is still the questions of self defense and allowing us, the general sheeple, to be armed, to be given the tools to defend our own, let alone arming all police.
Would it have made a difference?
Who knows BUT:- Is it not better to have and not use, than need and not have something at hand to save lives?