I was astonished to read about the weak (that’s the legislators and politicians) writing what the media called sweeping new rules on including a ban on the sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines, background checks for those buying ammunition and new restrictions on homemade firearms, and a host of other stupidity.
Still at least a federal judge has temporarily stopped this process in defense of the 2nd Amendment. Only what happens next if his ruling is overturned and it leads to door to door searches and direct action against gun owners (of both political persuasions) by Leo’s?
Will Democrats ‘rat’ (pun intended) side with the state against Republicans?
Or could that happen the other way around? Or both ways around !!!!!
Either way you look at this, the common enemy here would be THE STATE which could lead a violent reaction by some of the population to a gun grab.
That would not be the common definition of civil war (a war between citizens of the same country), a reactive attack against THE STATE would be called revolution and that will drag the White house into the equation in double-quick time.
After that POTUS would have only two choices.
Support the state which may bring about a general revolution and be seen as a betrayal by the people (and reading comment he’s on shaky ground now) or support the people (which would bring about political open warfare at a central government level in support of the state). Just think, California might just be the lit match that destroys the US.
Something tells me this is only the beginning of an interesting summer.